Daniel Craig: Blame Austin Powers for the Super-Serious James Bond Fil

Absolutely_CartAbsolutely_Cart NJ/NYC, United StatesPosts: 1,740MI6 Agent
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/daniel-craig-blame-austin-powers-for-the-super-104242883007.html

Interesting take. For those who want the quick version, Craig feels like the Austin Powers parody took something away from James Bond and had he continued the goofy spy route then it would have become a self-parody. So he did more serious films for a while. But now that we're past Austin Powers, perhaps the more goofy movies can come back.

Comments

  • DEFIANT 74205DEFIANT 74205 Perth, AustraliaPosts: 1,881MI6 Agent
    I sincerely hope not. I don't want gags in a Bond film. I want the film to be a serious adult adventure, played with a straight face, as it should be. I have so far liked Craig's films because they have been serious adult adventures. If it went back to the campiness of the 1970s I would find that extremely disappointing.
    "Watch the birdie, you bastard!"
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    Not going to happen :))
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • AlphaOmegaSinAlphaOmegaSin EnglandPosts: 10,924MI6 Agent
    I personally don't think Craig would fit well into an outlandish Film.
    1.On Her Majesties Secret Service 2.The Living Daylights 3.license To Kill 4.The Spy Who Loved Me 5.Goldfinger
  • superadosuperado Regent's Park West (CaliforniaPosts: 2,651MI6 Agent
    I hope they track down that wine-chugging bystander and the trained double-taking pigeons! :))
    "...the purposeful slant of his striding figure looked dangerous, as if he was making quickly for something bad that was happening further down the street." -SMERSH on 007 dossier photo, Ch. 6 FRWL.....
  • BlackleiterBlackleiter Washington, DCPosts: 5,615MI6 Agent
    edited December 2014
    https://www.yahoo.com/movies/daniel-craig-blame-austin-powers-for-the-super-104242883007.html

    Interesting take. For those who want the quick version, Craig feels like the Austin Powers parody took something away from James Bond and had he continued the goofy spy route then it would have become a self-parody. So he did more serious films for a while. But now that we're past Austin Powers, perhaps the more goofy movies can come back.

    Nope! I don't mind a touch of humor now and then in the form of the occasional witty quip like in the old Connery films. But back to "goofy" Bond movies? Never! X-(
    "Felix Leiter, a brother from Langley."
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    As far as I'm concerned they got the balance of humour just right
    With SF, as BL says. The odd cruel one liner or quip is all that's needed :))
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • Gassy ManGassy Man USAPosts: 2,972MI6 Agent
    There's a big difference between silly and fun. You can have elaborate lairs, colorful villains, exotic locations, cheeky humor, and fantastic plots without being silly -- think the Indiana Jones films, for instance (which owe so much to the original James Bond movies). It's all in the execution. That's another thing that makes the old Bond films so much more sophisticated -- they knew where the line was drawn. In many cases, they drew the line.
  • DEFIANT 74205DEFIANT 74205 Perth, AustraliaPosts: 1,881MI6 Agent
    Nope! I don't mind a touch of humor now and then in the form of the occassional witty quip like in the old Connery films.

    To what extent, though? Thunderball and Diamonds Are Forever had quite a lot more quips than say, From Russia With Love. Personally, I prefer the latter. Bond should be played with a straight face.
    "Watch the birdie, you bastard!"
  • Gassy ManGassy Man USAPosts: 2,972MI6 Agent
    A little clever wit goes a long way. It's not the quantity but the quality.
  • AlphaOmegaSinAlphaOmegaSin EnglandPosts: 10,924MI6 Agent
    Talking of Austin Powers, whatever happened to the fourth Film that was rumored?
    1.On Her Majesties Secret Service 2.The Living Daylights 3.license To Kill 4.The Spy Who Loved Me 5.Goldfinger
  • DEFIANT 74205DEFIANT 74205 Perth, AustraliaPosts: 1,881MI6 Agent
    Gassy Man wrote:
    A little clever wit goes a long way. It's not the quantity but the quality.

    Absolutely. I agree with this. Hell, even Fleming incorporated one or two in his novels. But I guess where we differ is where to draw the line. I do find the inclusion of wit in Connery's first two films have the balance just about right, and Casino Royale too. For example, lines like these are great:

    "The girl left in hysterics."
    "Found your technique too violent?"

    or

    "That doesn't matter. All I want is that Lektor."
    "All? Are you sure that's all you want?"

    or

    "That last hand nearly killed me."


    Lines like these are, in my view, cringeworthy:

    "I thought Christmas only comes once a year."

    or

    "Allow me to broaden your vocabulary."
    "Watch the birdie, you bastard!"
  • CmdrAtticusCmdrAtticus United StatesPosts: 1,102MI6 Agent
    I was so glad to read Craig's thoughts on this. It shows he knows that the Power's films grew out from the EON entries that had already made a parody of the character starting with DAF and then with the YOLT remake TSWLM.

    I'm glad he is mining the Fleming novels for storylines and to try to keep getting into Bond's character.

    As far as the humor, I think they're getting the balance right. I haven't groaned over any quips in the reboots yet.
  • broadshoulderbroadshoulder Acton, London, UKPosts: 1,363MI6 Agent
    Haven't Austin Powers died a death. Another enemy beaten off. X-(

    I did notice the little sprat on the EoN DVD.
    1. For Your Eyes Only 2. The Living Daylights 3 From Russia with Love 4. Casino Royale 5. OHMSS 6. Skyfall
  • Absolutely_CartAbsolutely_Cart NJ/NYC, United StatesPosts: 1,740MI6 Agent
    Talking of Austin Powers, whatever happened to the fourth Film that was rumored?

    I dunno. Austin Powers already did its thing and achieved what it wanted to do. I wouldn't tamper with a complete thought.
  • LPFilmsLPFilms Posts: 31MI6 Agent
    Gassy Man wrote:
    There's a big difference between silly and fun. You can have elaborate lairs, colorful villains, exotic locations, cheeky humor, and fantastic plots without being silly -- think the Indiana Jones films, for instance (which owe so much to the original James Bond movies). It's all in the execution. That's another thing that makes the old Bond films so much more sophisticated -- they knew where the line was drawn. In many cases, they drew the line.

    Exactly (though DAF, TMWTGG, MR, and DAD didn't seem to know where to draw that line hahaha). YOLT has many over the top aspects to it that go without mentioning, but it's taken seriously in the world of the film. All of the characters take a volcano lair as if it's actually UN-laughably feasible in their world. TSWLM as well, with Atlantis, the Lotus, Jaws, and Strombrerg's goal. Since there's no winking to the camera, and since it's not looked at in a ridiculous manner by the characters in the film, we the audience know it's over the top but accept it. It ends up feeling more larger-than-life and adventurous rather than just plain silly.
Sign In or Register to comment.