Royal Doulton Bulldog size

2»

Comments

  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,485MI6 Agent
    Paperbill wrote:
    danjaq_0ff wrote:
    Fools and there money -{

    But the large one you pictured is a large Bulldog and is not the type used in SF, Mr Daulton got it wrong, but what you believe is up to you Mr Bill, ASP is still right
    I will believe my eyes, instinct, and what Mr. Daulton told me. All due respect to you and ASP. Ok I am on to more productive things than the size of a porcelain Bulldog :)

    Yeah, well, we all remember your 'It's definitely a P99 Bond is shooting in Skyfall' thread. Look where your eyes and instincts got you there too.

    The fact is Mr Doulton does not own any of the Skyfall Bulldogs and the one he has in your pictures wasn't one of them. I have seen them, held them and talked extensively to the the people responsible for them, and it's the mid size version. Here's the proof....

    This is the screen used prop by one of the MI6 ID cards. Credit card size...

    jacksu_zps393b68c8.jpg

    Quite easy to see from the dimensions of the card that the dog is just under four inches high.


    Now the one seen in the cardboard box at the end was bolted in to a piece of plastizote so it was held centrally at all times. You can see from this picture that it lacks the size and detail of the larger bulldog and is still the medium one....

    asasasss_zps0d793a49.jpg


    And best of all. Here is one of the clean props sans the bomb damage, with the new Jack.

    photo9_zpsc6c10d71.jpg

    photo10_zpse06e8259.jpg


    And one of the bomb damaged versions with new Jack. There were several of each version, clean and damaged used in the film, with slightly different paint jobs (all were touched up). They are all mediums. There is not a single large version used in the production. The large version is just that... large and is way out of proportion with the screen used bulldogs. You only need to examine the stills and compare it to the props it is with and to see the facial detail is different to the large bulldogs to see that.

    photo11_zpse424d23a.jpg
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • Sir MilesSir Miles The Wrong Side Of The WardrobePosts: 26,554Chief of Staff
    Paperbill wrote:
    danjaq_0ff wrote:
    Fools and there money -{

    But the large one you pictured is a large Bulldog and is not the type used in SF, Mr Daulton got it wrong, but what you believe is up to you Mr Bill, ASP is still right
    I will believe my eyes, instinct, and what Mr. Daulton told me. All due respect to you and ASP. Ok I am on to more productive things than the size of a porcelain Bulldog :)

    This may be tough to take but both Asp9mm & Danjaq_0ff will be correct....they have seen the actual prop used on screen....it doesn't necessarily follow that what was supplied was used - perhaps the prop department sourced their own..?...or Mr Doulton has been mis-informed by his own people...?..but if you are happy with your purchase, then all is well... -{
    YNWA 97
  • Gadget MeisterGadget Meister Bicester, OxonPosts: 1,972MI6 Agent
    ASP, you've just saved me the time of photographing mine, many thanks. I think your set of pics is the most definitive I've seen, especially of one of the actual props. Gives me a good reference to recreate the head cracks on my original (non permanent before anybody croaks) Do you by any chance, or does anybody, have the actual dimensions of the box? Would be most grateful.
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,485MI6 Agent
    The box was CD box from Rymans I believe. Unfortunately they discontinued it in the screen used size some time back. The new one is slightly too long.
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • PaperbillPaperbill FloridaPosts: 810MI6 Agent
    Asp9mm is a gentleman and a scholar! I will never doubt his expertise again.
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,485MI6 Agent
    As I said, it's hardly your fault when the head of RD goes into detail about the size, you kinda expect him to know his stuff. Next time you see him though, put him right :D
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • Gadget MeisterGadget Meister Bicester, OxonPosts: 1,972MI6 Agent
  • danjaq_0ffdanjaq_0ff The SwampsPosts: 7,283MI6 Agent
    And I have sent you a turd in a box :D
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,485MI6 Agent
    How did you manage to fit him in a box?
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • The Domino EffectThe Domino Effect Posts: 3,631MI6 Agent
    danjaq_0ff wrote:
    And I have sent you a turd in a box :D

    What happened to the first and second?
  • danjaq_0ffdanjaq_0ff The SwampsPosts: 7,283MI6 Agent
    I dont know Dom, I could ask the dog :D
  • SimonTemplarSimonTemplar Posts: 77MI6 Agent
    Hi All,
    Having done some study of the original antique Royal Doulton bulldogs it seems this thread is worth reviving just for the sake of clarity.
    First of all to accurately date a piece the stamp is a useful guide
    http://www.chinafinders.com.au/dating_burslem.asp
    Going by the guide the example posted by Asp that was suppose to be a set use prop in Skyfall feature a back stamp B.7 from 1902-22.
    My research suggest Bulldog Jack first appeared just after the end of WW1 in 1918 as a celebration of Britain's victory over Germany though I'm not sure how long the original run lasted for, maybe for a few years. At the outbreak of WW2 in 1939 Jack was resurrected to invoke patriotic spirit once more featuring a newer RD stamp B.9. The earliest dated example of WW2 era Jack I have found so far is 1939. Now it gets more interesting. Contrary to what RD website is saying in it reference to their new Skyfall Jacks, Charles Noke did not design Jack in 1941 but much earlier in 1918 as is the case of the original Jack used in Skyfall. All WW2 Jacks from 1939 to 1941? has one significant difference is the dog's left eye are either painted in circle or rudimentary splash unlike the post WW1 Jack were the eye is well painted also seen in the original Jack used in Skyfall. Of course unless someone can point to me to an example that show otherwise I would be happy to retract ;)
    If I'm correct then RD has erroneously given the wrong information about the screen used original Jack, some Bond fans might be paying top dollars for a dated 1941 Jack with black circle painted eye believing it is close to screen accurate when they should be looking at the post WW1 version with good left eye. On both eras of production I seem to come across the large and small ones more frequently than the middle size ones, I probably attribute that to Skyfall :))
  • ppw3o6rppw3o6r Great BritainPosts: 2,271MI6 Agent
    Hi All,
    Having done some study of the original antique Royal Doulton bulldogs it seems this thread is worth reviving just for the sake of clarity.
    First of all to accurately date a piece the stamp is a useful guide
    http://www.chinafinders.com.au/dating_burslem.asp
    Going by the guide the example posted by Asp that was suppose to be a set use prop in Skyfall feature a back stamp B.7 from 1902-22.
    My research suggest Bulldog Jack first appeared just after the end of WW1 in 1918 as a celebration of Britain's victory over Germany though I'm not sure how long the original run lasted for, maybe for a few years. At the outbreak of WW2 in 1939 Jack was resurrected to invoke patriotic spirit once more featuring a newer RD stamp B.9. The earliest dated example of WW2 era Jack I have found so far is 1939. Now it gets more interesting. Contrary to what RD website is saying in it reference to their new Skyfall Jacks, Charles Noke did not design Jack in 1941 but much earlier in 1918 as is the case of the original Jack used in Skyfall. All WW2 Jacks from 1939 to 1941? has one significant difference is the dog's left eye are either painted in circle or rudimentary splash unlike the post WW1 Jack were the eye is well painted also seen in the original Jack used in Skyfall. Of course unless someone can point to me to an example that show otherwise I would be happy to retract ;)
    If I'm correct then RD has erroneously given the wrong information about the screen used original Jack, some Bond fans might be paying top dollars for a dated 1941 Jack with black circle painted eye believing it is close to screen accurate when they should be looking at the post WW1 version with good left eye. On both eras of production I seem to come across the large and small ones more frequently than the middle size ones, I probably attribute that to Skyfall :))

    Hi ST, I'm not an expert on the subject of Royal Doulton however 100% this is the base of the screen prop from Olivia Mansfield's memorial box. The size of the piece is medium -{

    Jack_Blownup2.jpg
  • SimonTemplarSimonTemplar Posts: 77MI6 Agent
    ppw3o6r wrote:

    Hi ST, I'm not an expert on the subject of Royal Doulton however 100% this is the base of the screen prop from Olivia Mansfield's memorial box. The size of the piece is medium -{

    Jack_Blownup2.jpg

    If you look at the link I posted the stamp on the bulldog is from 1902-22 but since Jack made it first appearance just after WW1 I would say the Jack used in Skyfall is between 1918-22.
    Interestingly I was watching Skyfall the other day and freeze frame a few shots of the bulldog and compare it to the photos of the prop used examples above and the paintwork don't quite match. Not saying they weren't used for the film but it is possible that the props people had several Jacks but the director decide to use footage from particular ones and the two above did not make it in the final edit

    image.jpg
  • ppw3o6rppw3o6r Great BritainPosts: 2,271MI6 Agent
    ppw3o6r wrote:

    Hi ST, I'm not an expert on the subject of Royal Doulton however 100% this is the base of the screen prop from Olivia Mansfield's memorial box. The size of the piece is medium -{

    Jack_Blownup2.jpg

    If you look at the link I posted the stamp on the bulldog is from 1902-22 but since Jack made it first appearance just after WW1 I would say the Jack used in Skyfall is between 1918-22.
    Interestingly I was watching Skyfall the other day and freeze frame a few shots of the bulldog and compare it to the photos of the prop used examples above and the paintwork don't quite match. Not saying they weren't used for the film but it is possible that the props people had several Jacks but the director decide to use footage from particular ones and the two above did not make it in the final edit

    image.jpg

    There were a small quantity utilised on the production. Each had the facial details altered slightly to match the tone of the scene which included the dremelled blown up & glued back together examples. The real expert on this subject is ASP9mm -{
  • PoorMansJBPoorMansJB USAPosts: 1,198MI6 Agent
    Current medium [?] Doulton Jack versus vintage large Jack:

    HUxc7c.jpg
  • SimonTemplarSimonTemplar Posts: 77MI6 Agent
    The large Jack has the circle painted eye. Without looking at the stamp I would guess it is WW2 1939 to early 1940s. If it has the proper Skyfall eye it most certainly be a 1918-22 original.
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,485MI6 Agent
    You can't go off the screen used markings on the eyes or collar or Union flag to date the screen used pieces. This is simply because they used several Jacks from different periods and applied details to make them resemble each other. They also cleaned some up and made them look virtually new with new fresh paint work and painted white body. These you see at the start of the film. So in short, the eye shape may be from one period, but it may have been applied to a later era Jack by the production.

    They bought in several Jacks for SKYFALL, and made multiples for both the fixed box version, the smashed/repaired version and the clean version seen at the start of the film. This is insurance if one is damaged during filming, obviously they can't stop filming while a new one is sourced.

    All of the screen used ones had waterbased applied crack details and these rubbed off through use. After filming they decided it would be a good idea to preserve the paintwork, so they were sent to be clear coated. Sadly this reacted slightly with the crack detailing and it spread slightly as the clear coat dried. So all of the screen used Jacks have a slightly washed crack effect over the top of the head now.

    In the SPECTRE teaser pic with the slate, you see Jack back again. The crack over the top of the head travels at a different angle to those seen in SKYFALL and the line is thicker. This can either mean it is a new Jack, or one of the original SKYFALL made ones that was backup and never appeared on screen. Due to the spreading, thicker crack line, I would say it was, as this is what happened when they were clear-coated.

    The size used was MEDIUM. 6 inches long by 4 inches high-ish.
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • SimonTemplarSimonTemplar Posts: 77MI6 Agent
    Hi Asp,
    Thankyou for your input.
    I can understand some WW2 Jacks being use too because sourcing good amount of 1918-22 originals can be pretty tough. The example you posted has the stamp use for the 1918-22. I suppose it is like filming "Saving Private Ryan" were many of the props were actually from the Vietnam war with subtle differences but disguised as WW2 because sourcing enough original wartime gear is too expensive. In light of this information I have to say the bulldogs used in Skyfall is meant to be the 1918-22 Jack even though some were actually repainted later WW2 version.
    Apart from the paintwork to the eyes and general age there is little to go by between the two period of Jacks except maybe the ears, the earlier version looks a little bit more batty and refined and it seems all the better closeup shots of Jack in Skyfall has or at least appear to have this type of ears though I cant tell the one in the box due to the angle.
  • ThomoThomo ReadingPosts: 949MI6 Agent
    This arrived today
    image.jpg
  • Bond Collectors' WeekendsBond Collectors' Weekends Gainesville, Florida USAPosts: 1,883MI6 Agent
    Asp9mm wrote:
    Ryman

    Following up, is this current size an incorrect size, please?

    http://www.ryman.co.uk/ryman-cd-storage-box-h135xw265xd150mm-capacity-24-cds
    Seven (007) James Bond Tours! Mission: Mexico!
  • Gadget MeisterGadget Meister Bicester, OxonPosts: 1,972MI6 Agent
    Too long. And the wrong label holder. The correct version is obsolete but was Ryman.
  • SFPROPSSFPROPS USAPosts: 380MI6 Agent
    How is it that the production finds the very last of everything it uses? :))
  • Bond Collectors' WeekendsBond Collectors' Weekends Gainesville, Florida USAPosts: 1,883MI6 Agent
    There are a lot of CD boxes on Google--if anyone finds one, please share it...
    Seven (007) James Bond Tours! Mission: Mexico!
  • welshboy78welshboy78 Posts: 10,292MI6 Agent
    Just arrived (though the way the seller packed Jack he might have been "skyfalled")

    Thanks for the info here and ASP for some tips on the various dated models.

    Fleming.jpeg
    Instagram - bondclothes007
Sign In or Register to comment.