Are you looking forward to Fleming's stories in the public domain?

13»

Comments

  • MilleniumForceMilleniumForce LondonPosts: 1,214MI6 Agent
    I don't think it would have that much of an effect. I mean, if Sherlock Holmes is in the public domain, why isn't every studio making films about the character? We might get a few unnofical ones here and there, but I don't think it would have a major effect on the official series. I'd like to see Amazon or Netflix do a big budget series. Each episode based on a novel, but close adaptations. I mean, you could do so much with Bond.
    1.LTK 2.AVTAK 3.OP 4.FYEO 5.TND 6.LALD 7.GE 8.GF 9.TSWLM 10.SPECTRE 11.SF 12.MR 13.YOLT 14.TLD 15.CR (06) 16.TMWTGG 17.TB 18.FRWL 19.TWINE 20.OHMSS 21.DAF 22.DAD 23.QoS 24.NSNA 25.DN 26.CR (67)
  • BarbelBarbel ScotlandPosts: 36,220Chief of Staff
    Well, in this century we have had three major Holmes series- the BBC Sherlock, the CBS Elementary, and the Warner Bros two (so far) movies. All have been successful. In addition, there was Mr Holmes http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3168230/ plus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes_(2010_film), a Russian version I know little about, yet another Hound Of The Baskervilles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hound_of_the_Baskervilles_(2002_film) and a sequel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes_and_the_Case_of_the_Silk_Stocking and no doubt others I've missed. Perhaps not every studio but it's clear that Sherlock Holmes is still a viable film character in the public domain.
  • DEFIANT 74205DEFIANT 74205 Perth, AustraliaPosts: 1,881MI6 Agent
    Also why can't copyright be passed on to future generations ? Or maybe it can

    Copyright can be assigned to others, including the author's estate. But the duration of copyright does not change - assignment of copyright does not 'reset the clock' so to speak. It expires (in Australia) 70 years after the death of the author, regardless of who owns copyright at the time.
    superado wrote:
    As I've mentioned in the times before when this topic came up, is I'd love for an actual lawyer to chime in, particularly one specializing in copyright law or maybe even entertainment law if that's applicable. Otherwise, I'm afraid our speculations might fall miles apart from the practical realities of this topic.

    I think the article Barbel linked to pretty much sums up the complexities with respect to this subject. There isn't just one set of rights associated with creating new Bond media; there are multiple different rights, with multiple different owners and multiple different expiry dates to consider.

    I practise in intellectual property law, but law differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. What may be law here in Australia is not necessarily so in Canada or the United States, but I believe the general principles of copyright would be quite similar between Berne Convention countries.
    "Watch the birdie, you bastard!"
Sign In or Register to comment.