If Disney bought the Bond franchise would a film of John Gardner's Never Send Flowers be any closer?

Silhouette ManSilhouette Man The last refuge of a scoundrelPosts: 8,695MI6 Agent
edited May 2021 in The James Bond Films
So, we all know that Disney's name has cropped up over the last two years or more in relation to their being an interested party in buying the James Bond franchise from Eon or at least in buying the distribution rights to the next Bond film or series of films. Obviously Disney have done a good job with growing the Star Wars franchise, so presumably they could do the same with the James Bond franchise. It might even result in a much-needed shot in the arm for the Bond films.

Many fans would likely be against the idea but to the John Gardner fan it opens up an interesting situation: if Disney did at some point buy the Bond franchise or the distribution rights would a film version of Gardner's Never Send Flowers (1993) be any closer in coming about?

As many literary Bond fans will know Never Send Flowers features the villain David Dragonpol's castle Schloss Drache which is described as looking like the castle at Disneyland and it of course features a climactic fight scene at Euro Disney in Paris (nowadays it's called Disneyland Resort, Paris of course). There would of course be the inherent problem in the story for a modern audience as the assassination target in the original 1993 novel was Princess Diana and her two sons. Presumably this could be changed to another VIP target easily enough (a politician, rock star etc.) According to Raymond Benson in his 'Gardner’s World' piece in 007 Magazine the original intention was to have a famous rock star as the target of the assassination in the Disney resort.

What do we think? Would Disney be interested in adapting such a Bond novel into a film, given its obvious links to their amusement park properties around the globe and the potential for large-scale "product placement"? To my mind, it would seem an open goal that they would be rather silly to avoid exploiting.

So, dare I ask, what do we think of such an idea? :)
"The tough man of the world. The Secret Agent. The man who was only a silhouette." - Ian Fleming, Moonraker (1955).

Comments

  • BarbelBarbel ScotlandPosts: 36,392Chief of Staff
    I think it's very, very unlikely. Even if Disney end up owning Bond, there's no guarantee they'd film the continuation novels- I'd say they're much more likely to cokk up, er, cook up original stories. Or at least "original" stories, if you see what I mean.
  • Silhouette ManSilhouette Man The last refuge of a scoundrelPosts: 8,695MI6 Agent
    Barbel wrote:
    I think it's very, very unlikely. Even if Disney end up owning Bond, there's no guarantee they'd film the continuation novels- I'd say they're much more likely to cokk up, er, cook up original stories. Or at least "original" stories, if you see what I mean.

    Sadly (as the Lord Defender of NSF on the interweb) I have to agree with you Barbel that it is very unlikely to ever happen. It's destined to be forever filed under "pipe dream" for me I guess. :#
    "The tough man of the world. The Secret Agent. The man who was only a silhouette." - Ian Fleming, Moonraker (1955).
  • Sir MilesSir Miles The Wrong Side Of The WardrobePosts: 26,624Chief of Staff
    Disney would only buy the cinematic Bond NOT the literary Bond so, thankfully, there’d be no chance of NSF being filmed {[]
    YNWA 97
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,294MI6 Agent
    Michael G Wilson was v disparaging about the Gardner novels, in particular when Bond says that he went to Disney land and expected to hate it but thought it was okay actually, saying and I quote 'I just didn't see what we could do with that kind of dialogue' to appreciative laughs at a London Bond event around the time of GE.
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • superadosuperado Regent's Park West (CaliforniaPosts: 2,652MI6 Agent
    Given the present climate of terrorism in famous public sites in equally famous cities of the world (Nice, Paris, London, etc.), I doubt Disney would allow any of their parks to be featured in a movie plot that involves shootouts and the usual movie violence and action sequences, even though if I remember correctly, how relatively benign the NSF Disney sequence was (deserted, right?)
    "...the purposeful slant of his striding figure looked dangerous, as if he was making quickly for something bad that was happening further down the street." -SMERSH on 007 dossier photo, Ch. 6 FRWL.....
  • caractacus pottscaractacus potts Orbital communicator, level 10Posts: 3,950MI6 Agent
    I'm sure once Disney buys Bond, Bond and his supporting cast will be integrated into the one big MickeyMouseMarvelStarWars universe, and there will be limitless potential for exciting new crossovers
  • The Domino EffectThe Domino Effect Posts: 3,631MI6 Agent
    I'm sure once Disney buys Bond, Bond and his supporting cast will be integrated into the one big MickeyMouseMarvelStarWars universe, and there will be limitless potential for exciting new crossovers

    Could the "Mickey Mouse" line in Spectre have been a subtle message to us all of what was to come? (I'll get my tin foil hat now).
  • caractacus pottscaractacus potts Orbital communicator, level 10Posts: 3,950MI6 Agent
    actually if Bond crossed over with The Incredibles (also part of the all-encompassing Disney mega-verse) that could be good, because at least The Incredibles has John Barry style music and Ken Adam style set design, both of which the current Bond films are in need of
  • BarbelBarbel ScotlandPosts: 36,392Chief of Staff
    I'm sure once Disney buys Bond, Bond and his supporting cast will be integrated into the one big MickeyMouseMarvelStarWars universe, and there will be limitless potential for exciting new crossovers

    Could the "Mickey Mouse" line in Spectre have been a subtle message to us all of what was to come? (I'll get my tin foil hat now).

    Na, that would be quite goofy... (Please get mine, too)
  • PeppermillPeppermill DelftPosts: 2,860MI6 Agent
    Barbel wrote:
    I think it's very, very unlikely. Even if Disney end up owning Bond, there's no guarantee they'd film the continuation novels- I'd say they're much more likely to cokk up, er, cook up original stories. Or at least "original" stories, if you see what I mean.

    Sadly (as the Lord Defender of NSF on the interweb) I have to agree with you Barbel that it is very unlikely to ever happen. It's destined to be forever filed under "pipe dream" for me I guess. :#

    Yes, I think it will remain a Fantasia forever.
    1. Ohmss 2. Frwl 3. Op 4. Tswlm 5. Tld 6. Ge 7. Yolt 8. Lald 9. Cr 10. Ltk 11. Dn 12. Gf 13. Qos 14. Mr 15. Tmwtgg 16. Fyeo 17. Twine 18. Sf 19. Tb 20 Tnd 21. Spectre 22 Daf 23. Avtak 24. Dad
  • caractacus pottscaractacus potts Orbital communicator, level 10Posts: 3,950MI6 Agent
    folks might want to watch the last Spider-Man film, as a taste of what could happen when universes merge. Spider-Man suddenly becomes Iron Man's kid sidekick, even though Spider-Man was always the more established iconic character until Robert Downey came along.
    So Bond might suddenly become Nick Fury's sidekick, and Q orders his gadgets from Stark labs. Too bad Han Solo is dead, because that could have been a good team-up.

    on the positive side, there'll be some great merchandising. I've been amazed by all the Star Wars related ads from completely unrelated industries, including car ads and internet service providers! Like, how much does a car cost? tens of thousands of dollars, but someones going to make a decision because the ad used the Star Wars logo? I even saw a gingerbread Millennium Falcon in my grocery store this morning, and it appeared to be an official product
    so what will we get for Bond? lunchboxes, bedsheets and pyjamas, what else? that BondWorld themepark we've all been dreaming about will definitely be a step closer
  • Silhouette ManSilhouette Man The last refuge of a scoundrelPosts: 8,695MI6 Agent
    Peppermill wrote:
    Barbel wrote:
    I think it's very, very unlikely. Even if Disney end up owning Bond, there's no guarantee they'd film the continuation novels- I'd say they're much more likely to cokk up, er, cook up original stories. Or at least "original" stories, if you see what I mean.

    Sadly (as the Lord Defender of NSF on the interweb) I have to agree with you Barbel that it is very unlikely to ever happen. It's destined to be forever filed under "pipe dream" for me I guess. :#

    Yes, I think it will remain a Fantasia forever.

    Don't be so sure. I might become a scriptwriter and adapt NSF. Everyone's worst nightmare! :o
    "The tough man of the world. The Secret Agent. The man who was only a silhouette." - Ian Fleming, Moonraker (1955).
  • caractacus pottscaractacus potts Orbital communicator, level 10Posts: 3,950MI6 Agent
    Disney may not have any more spare change left to buy the Bond franchise after buying 20th Century Fox and all its movie franchises today
    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/film/what-the-disney-fox-merger-means-for-the-future-of-movies/article37324802/
Sign In or Register to comment.