I just watched TND...

GeorgiboyGeorgiboy Posts: 632MI6 Agent
edited July 2007 in The James Bond Films
I just watched TND and I enjoyed every second of it. I hadn't watched it in a while and most people don't like it and I don't understand why. Someone please enlighten me on why it sucks? I thought Carver was a very good villain, he is my second favorite while Emilio Largo is my favorite.

I enjoyed it so much that I moved it on my favorites list from number 18 to number 4.
«1

Comments

  • emtiememtiem SurreyPosts: 5,723MI6 Agent
    Yeah; I think it's great- probably Pierce's best. Good action, nice design, interesting locations and not pretencious in the 'emotional' stakes. A good Bond film.
  • mhousty007mhousty007 IrelandPosts: 18MI6 Agent
    I really enjoy it too, although it is quite low down on my list. I dont understand why Carver gets such a bad press (no pun intended.) I think Jonathan Pryce is a great actor, his scheme was original, the PTS is good and Teri Hatcher looks fantastic.
  • actonsteveactonsteve Posts: 299MI6 Agent
    mhousty007 wrote:
    I really enjoy it too, although it is quite low down on my list. I dont understand why Carver gets such a bad press (no pun intended.) I think Jonathan Pryce is a great actor, his scheme was original, the PTS is good and Teri Hatcher looks fantastic.

    Why does Carver get a bad press? Simple. Theres no menace there. I dont believe him as a villain.

    The Brosnan era begins to slide with TND...
  • GeorgiboyGeorgiboy Posts: 632MI6 Agent
    edited July 2007
    I thought he was very menacing. He wasn't afraid to do anything to get on top, and he gives some of my favorite lines of the whole series...

    "Mr. Stamper, will you please kill those bast**ds!

    "Let the mayhem begin."

    "There's no news like bad news."

    He was charismatic and very very evil. I think he's much better than Renard or Gustav Graves. I even like him better than Sean Bean. He is imo the best brosnan villain.
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    edited July 2007
    Georgiboy wrote:
    Someone please enlighten me on why it sucks? I thought Carver was a very good villain, he is my second favorite while Emilio Largo is my favorite.
    I don't think TND sucks however I don't think it's a great Bond film. I think it's a competent Bond film (with a few brilliant elements) but I think that Carver is a terrible villain (IMO he's the poor man's version of Stromberg and Drax), I can't stand Wai Lin (IMO she introduced the 'look at me, I'm Bond's equal' :s) and I think that the plot was very derivative.

    As I said, I think it has some fantastic elements (Dr Kaufman, the car chase, the fight at the party, some of the dialogue, Brosnan's performance) but generally speaking I don't think it's a very memorable film.
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,286MI6 Agent
    Why do you want us to persuade you it sucks, Georgiboy! Just enjoy it...

    Some do, I didn't. Brosnan looks bulked up but tired, the press/media angle lacks versimilitude (ie its not believable) and the tone is a bit heavy, again few jokes really deliver. Climax on stealth ship very derivative and poor man's TSWLM. All a bit like FYEO, though it moves faster. The bike chase only needs a shout of 'fruit cart!' to complete it.
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • actonsteveactonsteve Posts: 299MI6 Agent
    Georgiboy wrote:
    I think he's much better than Renard or Gustav Graves. I even like him better than Sean Bean. He is imo the best brosnan villain.

    Now theres damning with very feint praise
  • darenhatdarenhat The Old PuebloPosts: 2,029Quartermasters
    Brosnan looks bulked up but tired

    This is one aspect I actually liked about TND...Brosnan seem to shed some of his 'pretty boy' image from Remington Steele that I felt dripped over into GE.
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    edited September 2007
    I remember seeing TND at the cinemas. I had seen GE two years earlier which I loved, and I remember being disappointed with TND. Alhough I have never disliked it, none of my later screenings have seen it improve in my mind.

    BTW, TND is the only Bond film to which I own the novelization (other than OP for which I own a comic book.) It's pretty good. ;)
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • taitytaity Posts: 702MI6 Agent
    actonsteve wrote:
    Georgiboy wrote:
    I think he's much better than Renard or Gustav Graves. I even like him better than Sean Bean. He is imo the best brosnan villain.

    Now theres damning with very feint praise

    To be fair none of the Brosnan villians ever seemedthat great.

    I think Pryce was a great actor that bought alot to the role. That said, I just don't think that there was much good to say about the character. For example, his relationship with his wife was never well established before he killed her. Her death would have meant more if they had scenes together.
  • Kirk James KirkKirk James Kirk Posts: 190MI6 Agent
    TND is my favorite Brosnan movie, as I feel it comes closest to the over-the-top nature of the classic Bonds. My main beef with the film is that the pacing is awful. I don't want to see one explosion after a car chase after an explosion after a motorcycle chase. In fact, pacing is a problem for all Brosnan films. It seems the producers aimed the movies at the dumbed down Bruckheimer film audiences, and it worked with great success. I just miss the classic Bond pacing where Bond spends a day or two at the villains house, and he walks around a lot, and he just sleeps with random women for no reason, other than he has time to kill. I don't have ADD, so I don't need everything shoved down my throat. Thankfully, Casino Royale seems to have somehwat slowed down the pace. I hope it stays that way for the next film.
  • GeorgiboyGeorgiboy Posts: 632MI6 Agent
    edited July 2007
    TND is my favorite Brosnan movie, as I feel it comes closest to the over-the-top nature of the classic Bonds. My main beef with the film is that the pacing is awful. I don't want to see one explosion after a car chase after an explosion after a motorcycle chase. In fact, pacing is a problem for all Brosnan films. It seems the producers aimed the movies at the dumbed down Bruckheimer film audiences, and it worked with great success. I just miss the classic Bond pacing where Bond spends a day or two at the villains house, and he walks around a lot, and he just sleeps with random women for no reason, other than he has time to kill. I don't have ADD, so I don't need everything shoved down my throat. Thankfully, Casino Royale seems to have somehwat slowed down the pace. I hope it stays that way for the next film.

    Most movies these days are like that. Just explosions and gunfights every second of the movie being crammed down our throats. But, in TND, it is only the second half of the movie that is like that, the first half leads up and up until everything explodes into nonstop action. That is what I like about TND.

    The only part of the movie I loathe is Wai Lin. She is boring and obnoxious. She is what Carver says she is..."pathetic". I thought Teri Hatcher did a pretty good job though.
  • ToshTogoToshTogo Rep. of South AfricaPosts: 103MI6 Agent
    TND was a disappointment, it seemed to lose momentum during the latter part of the movie, the story did not seem inspired at all. DAD and TND share the crown for the worst Brosnan Bonds
  • DAWUSSDAWUSS My homepagePosts: 517MI6 Agent
    TND was YOLT in the era of cable TV and the internet. It's a good film. Good, not great. I thought Carver was just a wee bit looney as opposed to sinister.
  • Golrush007Golrush007 South AfricaPosts: 3,421Quartermasters
    I would agree that TND is a good film (but then, so are all the Bond films). I particularly enjoy the PTS, and I think Stamper is a good henchman (if a bit too Red Grant-ish). I really liked Dr Kaufmann's brief cameo as well, and the score is very good.

    The only thing I really don't enjoy is the climax in the stealth boat. I feel it is just a bit too much of random machine gun fire, but that's just my opinion. ;)
  • John DrakeJohn Drake On assignmentPosts: 2,564MI6 Agent
    I think there's a lot to enjoy in TND and it's probably Brosnan's best outing. I thought his performance was a little awkward in GE, but he sorted that out here.

    Good points: :)

    Brosnan's performance.

    Michelle Yeoh. Some have complained about Yeoh being too much Bond's equal, (Hi Dan :)) ) but Yeoh is a HK action hero and you can't put her in a movie without having her kicking a few people in the face.

    Very good PTS.

    Wonderful Q scene. I always felt that Brosnan and Llewlyn had a real rapport.

    Some terrific fight sequences.

    Low points. :(

    Carver is a lamentable villain. Pryce is a fine actor, but he's awful here.

    Teri Hatcher. The chemistry between her and Brosnan is toxic. The love scene looks like the director had a gun pointed at them to make sure they actually went through it.

    And the climax is pretty lame. It turns into a Steven Seagal movie. Which is not a good thing.
  • Barry NelsonBarry Nelson ChicagoPosts: 1,508MI6 Agent
    One of the inetresting things about this forum is that two Bond fans can look at the same Bond movie and see different things. For example, I thought Brosnan's and Hatcher's scenes were very good. Mr Drake thought they were terrible together. I liked Jonathon Pryce, others didn't. Although I would not have had him try to fight Bond at the end. Michelle Yeoh was fine in her role. She was after all a Chinese spy, one wouldn't expect a Mary Goodnight type.

    Anyway Georgiboy, if you liked it, good for you. On this site, the second you say you like something, folks will be lined up to tell you you're nuts. For me TND is an enjoyable movie and I think Brosnan is great in it. Others think differently, it's a big Bond world.
  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    Definately thought TND was a step up from GE, I remember leaving the theatre thinking "Bond is back!" Oddly what's lessened for me over time is Brosnan's performance in it, kinda how Connery in DAF was awesome the first few times but then hasn't really aged well at all. Both had too many moments where they were doing...I don't know what, but it wasn't Bond IMO, each went off in their own weird direction. But TND overall is a great throwback Bond IMHO, lots to geek on in it, as many have commented. Too bad they stepped away from that direction with TWINE, always wondered what that film would've been like with Spottiswoode or even Campbell directing...oh well.

    So much promise in TND, that's what sticks out for me. Not a perfect mix but like YOLT the elements are all there.
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    edited July 2007
    John Drake wrote:
    Michelle Yeoh. Some have complained about Yeoh being too much Bond's equal, (Hi Dan :)) ) but Yeoh is a HK action hero and you can't put her in a movie without having her kicking a few people in the face.
    Hi. :)) I think you're right about Yeoh's casting; I guess I just don't think she should have been cast for that reason.

    (BTW you should credit the copyright to Loeff. ;))
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • Sweepy the CatSweepy the Cat Halifax, West Yorkshire, EnglaPosts: 986MI6 Agent
    TND is an underrated gem in my opinion but is gradually creeping up people's lists. Always a fave, full of bond elements, action and brozzer! B-)
    207qoznfl4.gif
  • Prince Kamal KhanPrince Kamal Khan Posts: 277MI6 Agent
    edited November 2007
    DAWUSS wrote:
    TND was YOLT in the era of cable TV and the internet.

    A good way to describe TND, DAWUSS. I would also call TND, YOLT and TSWLM for the ADHD crowd. It's been a while since I've seen it but it was the 1990s Bond film I enjoyed most on my initial viewing of it.

    It moves quickly, Brosnan is a lot more confident in the role the 2nd time around, David Arnold's score just screams "BOND IS BAAAACK!!!" in a way that was sorely missed in GE, the PTS is Brosnan's best, Carver is the only Brosnan villain who was a traditional, older megalomaniac in the Blofeld/Stromberg/Drax type mold and Paris is my favorite Brosnan Bond girl.

    Complaints?

    A few.

    1)I wish they had called the villain by his original name(Harmsway) and used his initial plot to level Hong Kong prior to Britain's returning it to Red China instead of recycling the WWIII plot of YOLT/TSWLM again.

    2)I wish Teri Hatcher had been the main girl. In some ways, Paris seemed a little like a precursor of Vesper Lynd. I also liked her playing opposite Brosnan(despite whatever offscreen problems occurred between them).

    3) Michelle Yeoh plays her role fine but there is really only room for one James Bond in a James Bond film. Turning the Bond girl into "Jane Bond" actually makes Bond less special when he should be the hero in his own film. I'm glad CR returned to the tradition of letting Bond be the hero again and the Bond girl not trying to be "007-in-drag". I think Wai Lin should have been Carver's henchwoman/partner-in-crime instead kinda like May Day or Xenia Onatopp.

    4) Too much political correctness, i.e., "Filthy habit" stuff and letting Communist China get off the hook too easily.

    Criticisms aside, TND benefits from being a Bond film that meets or exceeds one's expectations unlike GE which made me wish Dalton was still playing Bond or TWINE, the OHMSS/CR wannabe that turned into a bloated soap opera.

    TND is probably Brosnan's sleekest, least pretentious and most satisfying Bond effort.
  • taitytaity Posts: 702MI6 Agent
    I do like TND - I just always wish that it was more innovative plot wise. I felt that the villian never seemed like anything more than what we'd seen in previous outings. The henchmen were too similar to what we'd expect to see in a Bond movie.

    I liked the Teri Hatcher Bond girl - I just felt that I never believed that Bond really had true emotions for her given how little screen time she got. I doubt Maud Addams had much more screen time in TMWTGG - however with her death held up till significantly later in the picture it felt as if Bond had time to build a stronger relationship with her. With Paris it felt like the director said - Bond once liked this girl. Accept it.

    The really sad thing about TND is that it had alot of ideas that were really quite novel - I actually liked the idea of a Asian Kung Fu star as the lead woman, and I think Michelle Yeoh was a great bit of casting. I liked both the car park chase and the Ho Chin Min City bike chase. And the idea of a villian using the media to start a war was also very original - just not carried out well.

    One more gripe about the movie - I never felt that they went to Germany. I felt that they spent too much time inside parties, hotel rooms, car parks which could have been anywhere in the movie. They went to a geographically and culturally stunning country, to spend time at a party which could have been held in downtown LA. Note - they did the same thing with Istanbul in TWINE and Iceland in DAD. There was nothing that made the location unique to the movie.
  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    Criticisms aside, TND benefits from being a Bond film that meets or exceeds one's expectations unlike GE which made me wish Dalton was still playing Bond or TWINE, the OHMSS/CR wannabe that turned into a bloated soap opera.

    TND is probably Brosnan's sleekest, least pretentious and most satisfying Bond effort.
    Great way to put it PKK. It is what it is, and that ain't bad. :)
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    edited November 2007
    I think Wai Lin should have been Carver's henchwoman/partner-in-crime instead kinda like May Day or Xenia Onatopp.
    I've said it before, but it deserves repeating, I hated Wai Lin. Stacey Sutton, Wai Lin, Jinx and Vesper are my four least-favourite Bond girls, and what I loathed about Wai Lin, was that she was not simply intent on being strong but she had to be 'Bond's equal.' Like with Jinx, she was IMO completely in your face about it, and (to use a term borrowed from JFF) nauseously so. :#
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • bondaholic007bondaholic007 LondonPosts: 878MI6 Agent
    I dont think it was the best of the bond films, the best bit was probebly the first bit with the terrorist party. its not the worse its just not my most favourite about 14 in my ranks
  • Colonel ShatnerColonel Shatner Chavtastic Bristol, BritainPosts: 574MI6 Agent
    Tomorrow Never Dies felt like old skool Bond, a fun comic romp that was sleeker and more easy to digest than the very plodding and convoluted GoldenEye. I also think TWINE was hidiously underrated as well, even though Renard was a pathetic bad guy and Denise Richards was a total bimbo...
    'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...'
  • taitytaity Posts: 702MI6 Agent
    I also think TWINE was hidiously underrated as well, even though Renard was a pathetic bad guy and Denise Richards was a total bimbo...

    Well, thats off to a good start. Did you mention that the action scenes were very...action free? Or what about Elektra - who suffered from poor structual development. I also put it down as David Arnold's meh score. He did nice work with the ethinc and romantic music - jack all with the action.
  • Prince Kamal KhanPrince Kamal Khan Posts: 277MI6 Agent
    edited November 2007
    Dan Same wrote:
    I think Wai Lin should have been Carver's henchwoman/partner-in-crime instead kinda like May Day or Xenia Onatopp.
    I've said it before, but it deserves repeating, I hated Wai Lin. Stacey Sutton, Wai Lin, Jinx and Vesper are my four least-favourite Bond girls, and what I loathed about Wai Lin, was that she was not simply intent on being strong but she had to be 'Bond's equal.' Like with Jinx, she was IMO completely in your face about it, and (to use a term borrowed from JFF) nauseously so. :#

    I understand. I saw Michelle Yeoh on an interview around the time of TND's release. She recounted how she was informed they wanted her for the new James Bond film and her reaction was "They want me to play James Bond!!!" :s

    The only way she would agree to be in the film is if they made her character "just like James Bond in every way", disregarding the fact that if anybody but James Bond is "just like James Bond in every way" then James Bond is no longer special. That stated, she plays her character fine and ultimately Wai Lin got captured and had to rescued several times in the film. I just do not happen to care for her character. If she had to be in TND, I would rather she would've been a villainess. Especially after having to lose Teri Hatcher's underrated Paris.

    I understand your not being fond of Wai Lin, Jinx or Stacy but what problem do you have with Vesper? She's my favorite main Bond leading lady since Kara(possible exception of Natalya). And she definitely was not an "in-your-face" Jinx/Wai Lin-type.
  • Prince Kamal KhanPrince Kamal Khan Posts: 277MI6 Agent
    blueman wrote:
    Criticisms aside, TND benefits from being a Bond film that meets or exceeds one's expectations unlike GE which made me wish Dalton was still playing Bond or TWINE, the OHMSS/CR wannabe that turned into a bloated soap opera.

    TND is probably Brosnan's sleekest, least pretentious and most satisfying Bond effort.
    Great way to put it PKK. It is what it is, and that ain't bad. :)

    Thank you. I think I may like the 1st 2/3 of Brosnan's other "worst" Bond film DAD better than TND but all of TND is better than the CGI-ed up final 1/3 of DAD.
  • chrisno1chrisno1 LondonPosts: 3,270MI6 Agent
    TND is for me the best of the '90s Bonds. It came in for quite bad press on its release and as I recall word of mouth news was not good either. I never understood this as i thought it was excellent entertainment, with well devised action set peieces, a lacing of humour and some strong characters.

    The plot of TND is a clear re-hash of YOLT & TSWLM but these movies are two of the most enjoyable in the franchise (despite their ott nature) and if anything, TND is more realistic.

    First, it has a believable villian. I always felt later Bond villians were too young which gave them a certain menace but no depth. Pryce gives substance to a poorly written role; you believe he can issue orders and demand the respect of his men by position, power and ingenuity not through physical strength. His megalomania starts to manifest itself when he kills his wife, but he descends gradually into madness; this is much more like Goldfinger and Blofeld than Graves, Zorin and Reynard who are just overblown psychos.

    Wai Lin was a good character. There seem to be complaints about her being Bonds equal, but we've seen this before (eg. Anya Amasova, Holly Goodhead) and it never hurt those films. I like the interplay between her and Bond and the chemistry between them is much better than that of Bond and Paris. My one complaint is it takes the writers so long to actually introduce her; she is seen at the Berlin party and breaks into the factory, yet we are given no indication who she is. Raymond Bensons book has a scene between Bond and Lin which introduces her character without betraying her role as a spy.

    David Arnold came on board to compose and what a fantastic effort, easily the best of the latter-day Bond scores, and one he has failed to match since. It fairly pounds along, assisted by Moby's re-vamped JBTheme, and incorporates many themes from the John Barry era as well Arnolds his own. Disappointingly Sherlyl Crow makes a hatchet job of the theme song (I always felt the producers should have asked Robbie Williams to do a theme song in the 90s, I think he'd have made a good stab at this one).

    Minor characters abound in TND. It was good (but unnecessary) to see Wade return and the extra characters in the War Room are well drawn. The best creation is Dr. Kaufmann, a quite wonderful cameo with a sinister introduction and lines as causticly funny as Bonds own. Stamper is underused and has little effect. I pity poor Teri Hatcher as Paris Carver; an impossible role given it is so slightly written. M sends Bond to Berlin to openly woo her, and she falls for it, despite being a happily married wife. There is no reason for her to betray her husband and I think the actors recognition of the plot device shows in their scenes together. When they first meet the two are frosty, hostile, and it works well, when they get intimate it breaks down completely.

    Once again Bensons novelisation develops all these characters, gives them substance and motives that are missing from the finished movie.
    I have a feeling some scenes were edited out during post production to ensure a running time of less than 2hours, but I havent read this in any publication.

    The editing is actually very good in TND, its slick and urgent and during the action scenes like the party fight, factory escape & car chase, the parachute jump & the motorbike chase it is the editing which keeps us rivited not the direction.

    I agree wholeheartedly with comments about the climax. For many years I have longed for a big climatic battle scene a-la YOLT, OHMSS and TSWLM; but time and again the producers disappoint and the 90s Bonds inparticular do resemble Steven Segal movies by their finales, especially TND. Bond and Wai Lins two-handed demolition of the stealth boat is by far the worst part of this movie, unrealistic in the extreme and (curious to think) Bond probably kills more villians in this sequence than in any other Bond film. It even gets tiresome. Far better perhaps to have the SBS lauch an attack and leave Bond to tackle the major villians.

    So, yes, there are faults, but then again which Bond film doesnt? I prefer TND to the rest of Brosnans Bonds because it looks and feels like a return to the classic Bond era, with strong villians, an accessible plot and great action. Brosnan looks and acts his best in this film, something of a surprise given that he regards working on TND as his worst 007 experience. In fact it was Brosnans vetoing of the original script which led to production delays and then a rushed post-production in time for xmas97, which possibly explains some of the more messy parts you see on the screen. None the less for me TND is firmly in the favourites list.
Sign In or Register to comment.