^ Just so that there's not a three-year gap between it and DN/FRwL, both of which feel to me like semi-direct prequels to it.
There's not a three-year gap between FRWL and TB. There's a year in between, with GF. They aren't prequels. Plus, the gap makes sense considering how long it took SPECTRE to plan their operation. Angelo spent 2 years preparing.
I hadn't even considered leaving FRwL's setting in its release year because of the direct connections between it and DN, but what you've told me does make sense and helps to better rationalize the gap between FRwL and TB.
TB cannot take place before September 1965. There is an overt indicator in the film itself.
Can you elaborate, please?
As an aside, I was wondering if there's anything that would get in the way of moving Diamonds are Forever from its release year so that it's chronologically closer in proximity to On Her Majesty's Secret Service?
I hadn't even considered leaving FRwL's setting in its release year because of the direct connections between it and DN, but what you've told me does make sense and helps to better rationalize the gap between FRwL and TB.
So far, it would seem that QoS is the only Bond film not meant to take place in the year it was made.
TB cannot take place before September 1965. There is an overt indicator in the film itself.
Can you elaborate, please?
As an aside, I was wondering if there's anything that would get in the way of moving Diamonds are Forever from its release year so that it's chronologically closer in proximity to On Her Majesty's Secret Service?
Why are you even trying to do this? Bond had been on leave before DAF. It's mentioned in the film.
I was wondering if there's anything that would get in the way of moving Diamonds are Forever from its release year so that it's chronologically closer in proximity to On Her Majesty's Secret Service?
Yes, the styling of the Ford Mustang: it didn't look like this before 1971.
Also, the Triumph Stag (as driven by Peter Franks) was introduced between OHMSS and DAF.
Why are you even trying to do this? Bond had been on leave before DAF. It's mentioned in the film.
A synopsis I read of the "cold open" sequence of DaF has me convinced that it's meant to be a direct result of Blofeld's involvement in Tracy's death, even if there's no overt indications of that in the sequence itself, and I was trying to work out how to make it work without there being a two-year gap between the two sequences (OHMSS' ending and DaF's beginning).
However, if Bond had been on leave, there's no need to try and rationalize the films being closer in proximity.
A synopsis I read of the "cold open" sequence of DaF had me convinced that it's meant to be a direct result of Blofeld's involvement in Tracy's death, even if there's no overt indications of that in the sequence itself.
That scene could take place any time between OHMSS and the rest of DAF. Apart from the PTS, DAF definitely takes place in 1971.
Like I said in the edit I made to my last comment, Bond being on leave (a factor I hadn't been aware of) does provide the rationalization I was looking for to explain why there's a gap between OHMSS' ending and DaF's "cold open" beginning.
^ I was planning on waiting to finish the film before giving any specific thoughts on it, but since you asked, I really like Domino; she reminds me a little bit of Honey Ryder, as well as Vesper and Camille.
The scene where Bond goes and plays cards with Largo also heavily reminds me of the first couple of card-playing sequences from Casino Royale, and is really the first card-playing scene in the Old!Bond Continuity that has done so.
I hadn't even noticed the dating thing on the picture of Domino and her brother, which is why I said there wasn't any overt indicators as to when it takes place.
It's unrealistic to believe that Bond is an 'ageless' character in the pre-Craig films when certain of said films contain defined dating (two examples being Tracy Bond's birth and death years - 1943 and 1969, respectively - and Paris Carver's birth year - 1969).
On my earlier post, you said Connery to Dalton were one continuity, so are you suggesting that Bond (Connery's being born in say 1930) had a relationship with Paris (born in 1969)? Yet were clearly around the same age when they met again?
On my earlier post, you said Connery to Dalton were one continuity, so are you suggesting that Bond (Connery's being born in say 1930) had a relationship with Paris (born in 1969)? Yet were clearly around the same age when they met again?
That does create a 'wrinkle' I hadn't considered, and there's not really any way to rationalize it away.
However, it's not unheard-of for there to be a few things in any long-running franchise that don't match up even when the films in said franchise are meant to occupy a single largely continuous reality.
LoeffelholzThe United States, With LovePosts: 8,990Quartermasters
It's like trying to discuss what 'was' before the big bang. At some point, science breaks down B-)
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
It's like trying to discuss what 'was' before the big bang. At some point, science breaks down B-)
please rationalize that... )
:v
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Comments
There's not a three-year gap between FRWL and TB. There's a year in between, with GF. They aren't prequels. Plus, the gap makes sense considering how long it took SPECTRE to plan their operation. Angelo spent 2 years preparing.
DN was released in late 1962, so even 6 months after that would be 1963. The first seen we see Bond looks like springtime.
Can you elaborate, please?
As an aside, I was wondering if there's anything that would get in the way of moving Diamonds are Forever from its release year so that it's chronologically closer in proximity to On Her Majesty's Secret Service?
So far, it would seem that QoS is the only Bond film not meant to take place in the year it was made.
Why are you even trying to do this? Bond had been on leave before DAF. It's mentioned in the film.
Yes, the styling of the Ford Mustang: it didn't look like this before 1971.
Also, the Triumph Stag (as driven by Peter Franks) was introduced between OHMSS and DAF.
A synopsis I read of the "cold open" sequence of DaF has me convinced that it's meant to be a direct result of Blofeld's involvement in Tracy's death, even if there's no overt indications of that in the sequence itself, and I was trying to work out how to make it work without there being a two-year gap between the two sequences (OHMSS' ending and DaF's beginning).
However, if Bond had been on leave, there's no need to try and rationalize the films being closer in proximity.
That scene could take place any time between OHMSS and the rest of DAF. Apart from the PTS, DAF definitely takes place in 1971.
Which would also point to 1971.
The scene where Bond goes and plays cards with Largo also heavily reminds me of the first couple of card-playing sequences from Casino Royale, and is really the first card-playing scene in the Old!Bond Continuity that has done so.
Hm, I was thinking more about this post above, and you perhaps acknowledging that you were wrong?
On my earlier post, you said Connery to Dalton were one continuity, so are you suggesting that Bond (Connery's being born in say 1930) had a relationship with Paris (born in 1969)? Yet were clearly around the same age when they met again?
That does create a 'wrinkle' I hadn't considered, and there's not really any way to rationalize it away.
However, it's not unheard-of for there to be a few things in any long-running franchise that don't match up even when the films in said franchise are meant to occupy a single largely continuous reality.
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
please rationalize that...
:v
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/wish-i-was-at-disneyland/id1202780413?mt=2