I agree that one or more of that cast are not really what they seem.
You are wise. -{
Yes, is it possible because of the Bond geekdom that EON wants to use us to spread false publicity for them, rightly expecting us to jump all over on the Oberhauser character with speculations and "predictions"? Announcing that Waltz is Blofeld at this point would just raise expectations too unreasonably high by the time the movie comes out.
"...the purposeful slant of his striding figure looked dangerous, as if he was making quickly for something bad that was happening further down the street." -SMERSH on 007 dossier photo, Ch. 6 FRWL.....
Every 2-3 years depending on the economy and the society, there is a new Bond film. It is like the Olympics of the movie industry!
And great events in the world happens every 2 years, the Olympics and the elections, depending what country you live in. But the World Cup only happens once every 4 years.
Yes, is it possible because of the Bond geekdom that EON wants to use us to spread false publicity for them, rightly expecting us to jump all over on the Oberhauser character with speculations and "predictions"? Announcing that Waltz is Blofeld at this point would just raise expectations too unreasonably high by the time the movie comes out.
It's true that the "Waltz is Blofeld" rumour was all over the news just as Waltz was cast, so it would be no surprise at all if he indeed is. But he's just so perfect for that character that it would be a real waste to cast him and then use him just as a red herring. Yes, if Seydoux or Bellucci are Blofeld it would be more surprising, but I'm not looking for the "Sixth Sense" type of ending in a Bond movie anyway.
superadoRegent's Park West (CaliforniaPosts: 2,652MI6 Agent
Did I mention how stoked I was with the title?!?! I mean, of all the one word movie titles that seem to be in vogue right now, this one carried so much context with it. Case in point, what's the meaning of Skyfall and why should I care? Oh, yeah, that's where Albert Finney brews his own ale while reading Bronte (take your pick).
"...the purposeful slant of his striding figure looked dangerous, as if he was making quickly for something bad that was happening further down the street." -SMERSH on 007 dossier photo, Ch. 6 FRWL.....
When SPECTRE was rumoured the other week I wasn't too thrilled. But I realised this morning that I am like a crack addict when it comes to Bond. They could have called it Bananas and I would still be salivating at the thought of the next film and wondering what was next. I am already hooked and stoked. Can't wait. Should be fun.
I agree with those who say one or more of the characters won't be what they seem. Waltz as Blofeld seems too obvious (but didn't we say the same thing about Mallory being M for a while?). Andrew Scott as a baddy is also too obvious (see previous comment about Waltz). But that said, I don't buy Bellucci as Blofeld. I think you need a real actor for that role because there's a fair chance of it being a recurring character (I hope they don't bring back Blofeld and then kill him/her in the same film!) and as much as I lust/drool/salivate/worship/adore Bellucci and as thrilled to bits as I am at having her in this film, I just don't see her being a good enough actor to carry a role like that. Sorry, Monica, ti amo cara!
Yes, if Seydoux or Bellucci are Blofeld it would be more surprising, but I'm not looking for the "Sixth Sense" type of ending in a Bond movie anyway.
I don't think it'll be a reveal, but an accepted up front thrust.
You mean,in the first 30 minutes of exposition, you first meet Bellucci's character and she's Blofeld,there and then? Then why call her character "Lucia Sciarra"? was Blofeld renamed Lucia Siarra Blofeld? I don't think so.
LoeffelholzThe United States, With LovePosts: 8,993Quartermasters
I'm ecstatic about the title, now that it's 'out there.' It brought an immediate smile to my face, and a thrill to my heart. On these very boards, I had speculated that they wouldn't use two one-word titles in row, and was reminded about GF and TB ;% Quite so. And here they are, back to back one-word titles beginning with an 's,' no less...I suppose I should have said I wouldn't do it that way, but Eon these days is certainly in a groove, and why argue with it?
As obvious as it is to those of us who have been certified (or certifiable) as Bond Savants, SPECTRE actually is a cracking good title on its own, but it will ripple through fandom and generate a self-sustaining buzz as we parse and discuss.
Cristoph Waltz - brilliant. Dave Bautista - brilliant. Monica Belluci - WOW. A lovely surprise. I envision a femme fatale character, but would be delighted if Irma Bunt were given a 21st Century twist and end up as a smoking hot deadly dangerous female animal...
Add the new regulars at MI6, and the Aston Martin DB10, and shall we say that they've already sold me the tickets? :007)
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
LoeffelholzThe United States, With LovePosts: 8,993Quartermasters
If this world is a just world he will keep playing Blofeld for one or two more Bond Movies.
And hopefully "The Garden Of Death" will be used
Hopefully that'll be in Bond 25.
Amen to that! {[]
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
For decades Bond was officially the highest grossing most successful film series out there. In fact, there wasn't even a close second. However, in this second decade of the 21st century, film series are all the rage. Harry Potter, Marvel, XMen, Fast and Furious to name a few. Now we have Star Wars back so I am sure the producers see the need to make not only a hugely successful entry into the Bond series, but a world class film to compete with the other now well established series.
The cast and crew we were introduced to yesterday are without a doubt world class. However, they will be nothing without a great script. Here's hoping we get the film event of the decade and it is able to out do all the other competition.
You know how some say that SF is a remake of TWINE...?
Now, with the new film. The Mr Kill-style henchman. The snow theme. The Aston Martin unveiled at the press conference, looking like a bar of soap. The two new gals paraded. The villain who appears to be one sort of person at the beginning of the film and winds up another. A Bond actor in his fourth outing, looking a bit C&A.
Yes... it's the new DAD....
As for Waltz and the Moriaty actor, this is all well and good, it's just... they are not original. We know their bag of tricks. It was Tarantino - passed over by the producers - who discovered Walz, and the Sherlock team who unearthed the Moriaty guy.
With Dr No, Red Grant, GF and most of 'em, they were played by actors who are new to us.
It's funny, I just ran across a relatively old interview with Michael G.Wilson, must have been somewhere pre Casino Royale when these questions were asked:
ANY CHANCE OF BRINGING BACK SPECTRE OR BLOFELD?
Well, with Spectre and Blofeld, the last film we did was DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER in 1971. When I talk about not looking backwards, that is looking backwards. We’ve kind of moved beyond that.
WELL, HE WAS IN "FOR YOUR EYES ONLY."
The guy down the chimney? [laughs and quickly moves on to another question]
It's intresting how a few years ago they would have said they would never bring back Spectre or Blofeld. "We've kind of moved beyong that.." I'm glad they changed there minds though!
superadoRegent's Park West (CaliforniaPosts: 2,652MI6 Agent
Well, as they say, "NSNA," pun intended! I think legally putting to bed the McClory claims over the TB/Blofeld/SPECTRE rights, which happened around after CR, changed things for EON's planning. I'm sure it cost them money to finally settle that decades long issue and they wanted to get something back from that investment.
"...the purposeful slant of his striding figure looked dangerous, as if he was making quickly for something bad that was happening further down the street." -SMERSH on 007 dossier photo, Ch. 6 FRWL.....
Comments
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
Yes, is it possible because of the Bond geekdom that EON wants to use us to spread false publicity for them, rightly expecting us to jump all over on the Oberhauser character with speculations and "predictions"? Announcing that Waltz is Blofeld at this point would just raise expectations too unreasonably high by the time the movie comes out.
And great events in the world happens every 2 years, the Olympics and the elections, depending what country you live in. But the World Cup only happens once every 4 years.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
It's true that the "Waltz is Blofeld" rumour was all over the news just as Waltz was cast, so it would be no surprise at all if he indeed is. But he's just so perfect for that character that it would be a real waste to cast him and then use him just as a red herring. Yes, if Seydoux or Bellucci are Blofeld it would be more surprising, but I'm not looking for the "Sixth Sense" type of ending in a Bond movie anyway.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
I agree with those who say one or more of the characters won't be what they seem. Waltz as Blofeld seems too obvious (but didn't we say the same thing about Mallory being M for a while?). Andrew Scott as a baddy is also too obvious (see previous comment about Waltz). But that said, I don't buy Bellucci as Blofeld. I think you need a real actor for that role because there's a fair chance of it being a recurring character (I hope they don't bring back Blofeld and then kill him/her in the same film!) and as much as I lust/drool/salivate/worship/adore Bellucci and as thrilled to bits as I am at having her in this film, I just don't see her being a good enough actor to carry a role like that. Sorry, Monica, ti amo cara!
You mean,in the first 30 minutes of exposition, you first meet Bellucci's character and she's Blofeld,there and then? Then why call her character "Lucia Sciarra"? was Blofeld renamed Lucia Siarra Blofeld? I don't think so.
As obvious as it is to those of us who have been certified (or certifiable) as Bond Savants, SPECTRE actually is a cracking good title on its own, but it will ripple through fandom and generate a self-sustaining buzz as we parse and discuss.
Cristoph Waltz - brilliant. Dave Bautista - brilliant. Monica Belluci - WOW. A lovely surprise. I envision a femme fatale character, but would be delighted if Irma Bunt were given a 21st Century twist and end up as a smoking hot deadly dangerous female animal...
Add the new regulars at MI6, and the Aston Martin DB10, and shall we say that they've already sold me the tickets? :007)
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Amen to that! {[]
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
it's all speculation.
really, I'm really friggin exited -{
mountainburdphotography.wordpress.com
As am I :007) It's had me smiling all day.
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
one of a handful of movies this year I might ACTUALLY go to the midnight premier for
mountainburdphotography.wordpress.com
The cast and crew we were introduced to yesterday are without a doubt world class. However, they will be nothing without a great script. Here's hoping we get the film event of the decade and it is able to out do all the other competition.
I can't wait!
I think that it's great - the poster is great, the cast (minus Kleinman) is great - I am just hoping that they keep their fingers off from OHMSS!
So Ian, what are your thoughts?
And how is life in Denmark?
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Another Bond Christmas film to go along with OHMSS.
When one Glass of Crabbies becomes Ten
For the new bond !
Now, with the new film. The Mr Kill-style henchman. The snow theme. The Aston Martin unveiled at the press conference, looking like a bar of soap. The two new gals paraded. The villain who appears to be one sort of person at the beginning of the film and winds up another. A Bond actor in his fourth outing, looking a bit C&A.
Yes... it's the new DAD....
As for Waltz and the Moriaty actor, this is all well and good, it's just... they are not original. We know their bag of tricks. It was Tarantino - passed over by the producers - who discovered Walz, and the Sherlock team who unearthed the Moriaty guy.
With Dr No, Red Grant, GF and most of 'em, they were played by actors who are new to us.
Roger Moore 1927-2017
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
ANY CHANCE OF BRINGING BACK SPECTRE OR BLOFELD?
Well, with Spectre and Blofeld, the last film we did was DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER in 1971. When I talk about not looking backwards, that is looking backwards. We’ve kind of moved beyond that.
WELL, HE WAS IN "FOR YOUR EYES ONLY."
The guy down the chimney? [laughs and quickly moves on to another question]
It's intresting how a few years ago they would have said they would never bring back Spectre or Blofeld. "We've kind of moved beyong that.." I'm glad they changed there minds though!
YouTube channel Support my channel on Patreon Twitter Facebook fanpage